During a recent appearance on “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills After Show,” Sutton Stracke shared new details about her past connection to Rodger Berman, the estranged husband of Rachel Zoe.
The revelation offered a rare look into overlapping social circles that existed long before Sutton joined the series, tying together the worlds of fashion, New York society, and reality television.
A Longstanding Connection
Sutton explained that her connection to Rachel and Rodger dates back years, rooted in shared environments and family life.
“We have known them since James, my youngest, was in kindergarten, first grade. [That’s when] they came into the school,” said Sutton. “So I’ve known her a very long time, and it was like a family friend.”
The timeline places their relationship well before Sutton became a public figure on Bravo, reinforcing that these connections were formed organically, not through television.
“I Knew Roger Better Than I Knew Rachel”
As Sutton continued, she offered a detail that stood out immediately.
“I knew Roger better than I knew Rachel,” said Sutton.
The comment adds an unexpected dimension to the relationship, suggesting that her connection to Rodger was more direct than many might assume.
When asked to elaborate, Sutton pointed to proximity rather than anything more complicated.
“I don’t know. He was just around more,” Sutton said. “Like in New York especially, I would see him a lot with like our mutual friends.”
More Than a Passing Acquaintance
GettySutton also revealed that her interactions with Rodger extended beyond social settings.
“Did you get along with him?” she was asked.
“Yeah,” said Sutton. “I mean, he’s tough, but yeah. … I went to him for business advice one time. … When I did that, [Rachel] wasn’t at the office. He was [at the office]. … He was an investment banker.”
That detail underscores the level of familiarity between them. This was not a distant connection. It included real conversations and professional overlap.
Why This Moment Stands Out
On a show typically focused on present-day dynamics, Sutton’s comments stood out because they reached into the past and added context.
Rather than introducing conflict, she provided insight. A reminder that many of the relationships within this world are shaped by years of shared history that existed long before cameras were involved.
It is also a reflection of Sutton’s approach on the series. She often brings a level of transparency that fills in the gaps behind the scenes, offering viewers a clearer picture of how these social circles intersect.
And in this case, that intersection connects two very different but closely linked worlds.
